Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
If an item of property qualifies for both §179 expensing and bonus depreciation, the §179 expensing amount is computed first, and then bonus depreciation is taken based on the item’s remaining income tax basis. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:49 pm
If an item of property qualifies for both §179 expensing and bonus depreciation, the §179 expensing amount is computed first, and then bonus depreciation is taken based on the item’s remaining income tax basis. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:57 am
Posted in our "Properties Disclosure" Practice Area, this comprehensive "Properties Disclosure Handbook" provides a heap of practical guidance about the disclosure obligations under Item 102 of Regulation S-K, a topic never covered in any other securities law treatise... [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:03 am
’ United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:48 am
Whether the Charter shareholders pleadings stated a claim will have to await further briefing.The case is No. 11418-VCG. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
As the Second Circuit Court of Appeals noted in Chosun International, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:38 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 11:10 am
The Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:10 am
In People v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
Oracle once stated its intent to "bring Android back into the Java fold" by making Google comply with the Java rules the rest of the industry has accepted. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:39 am
People v. [read post]
