Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
Delano v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
Buckmanpreempted the exception (see Garcia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:28 am
”Second, the second sentence of § 1338(a) is deleted and replaced with: “No State court shall have jurisdiction over any claim for relief arising from any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, or copyrights,” with “State” defined broadly to include the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and territories.Finally, the act adds a new section (28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm
” Gengo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:14 am
Tørsløv and Ludvig S. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:51 am
Davidson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:24 am
In particular, the court case (Supreme Beef v USDA) limited the ability of USDA to enforce its regulations, effectively barring the government from shutting down a plant which fails to meet safety standards for Salmonella. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
In particular, the court case (Supreme Beef v USDA) limited the ability of USDA to enforce its regulations, effectively barring the government from shutting down a plant which fails to meet safety standards for Salmonella. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:42 am
The case is Horizon Ethanol LLC et al v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:24 am
Ever since the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am
’” Citing Sepulveda v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
” Justice Ginsburg argued that the Justices should have delayed hearing such cases while the state-by-state process evolved, or alternatively, should have struck down just the Texas law without declaring a right to privacy that legalized the procedure nationwide The ABA Journal’s Jill Schachner Chanen discusses the film The Loving Story, a documentary on the couple behind the Court’s landmark decision in Loving v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
" On September 12, in a lengthy company release, Luminant, the largest power generator in Texas that employees approximately 4,400 employees throughout the state (2,580 in coal plant and mining operations) announced the need to close facilities and layoff workers to comply with U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:21 am
by Dennis Crouch Lifetime Indus v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
Analysis of out-of-title work claim controlled by the duties and allocation of the positions involved at the time the work was performedMatter of Kopyt v Governor's Office of Employee Relations, 2008 NY Slip Op 08222, Decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Governor's Office of Employee Relations adopted the findings of the Division of Classification and Compensation of the New York State Department of Civil Service in deciding out-of-title… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
Here are some examples:In short, I meet officers in the agencies undertaking interception work and officials in the departments of the Secretaries of State/Ministers which issue the warrants. [read post]
