Search for: "United States v. Gross"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
United States Kanye West’s music video for “Famous” has sparked outrage for portraying naked celebrities in bed, in the form of life-like wax figures, and IPKat has looked at whether those portrayed can use publicity rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:05 am
Therefore, the Supreme Court’s decision in Poe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 30089/04 [2011] ECHR 1121 (19 July 2011) ? [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Bruno Aiub (Monark) and State Prosecution Office (São Paulo, MPSP) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
In the words of the court: These facts depict a sequence of events that are gross, degrading, and deeply concerning. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
They’re just not an antitrust violation in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
A State, then, which violated its own contract was suable in the courts of the United States for that violation. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Linford: then we also don’t need naked licensing and assignment in gross as doctrines either. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
United States Stanford&rsq [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
Newest Charges Related to Alleged COVID-19 Fraud United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
This provision makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
The Court set the tone for its robust judicial review of the executive branch in one of the first of these cases, Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Watts, No. 07-2462 In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that the defendants' failure to supervise resulted in arrests without probable cause, illegal warrantless searches, and use of excessive force, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to establish that the actions of defendants amounted to supervisory encouragement, condonation or acquiescence, or gross negligence amounting to deliberate indifference. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
