Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1361 - 1380 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
EUGENE VOLOKH PROPERLY CRITICIZES A SLOPPY OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE GOMEZ in the Virgin Islands -- it's a post-Heller Second Amendment opinion in which Judge Gomez applies -- clearly outdated -- pre-Heller caselaw: It may well be that the defendant didn't provide enough argument to support his motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 7:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Dominguez's case hadn't yet come out, so we didn't talk about that. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:29 pm by Steve Kalar
Dec. 5, 2011), decision available here.Just don't give that BOP "time-out" to "rehabilitate" a defendant on supervised release. . . [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’ `We came up together through school[, high school and elementary]. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But, of course, we don't ever ask about the constitutional implications of criminalizing, say, shoplifting, drinking in public (as distinguished from carrying guns in public), or failing to give the proper signal when one is preparing to turn. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 11:17 am
You don't want to be a lawyer before them on a Bar discipline matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
” Why can’t we hold this matter in abeyance and see whether that happens, asks Judge Henderson? [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:32 am by Dylan Gibbs
Here are the lowlights.An Ontario judge pushed defendants to plead guilty by telling defence counsel that their clients were “fucked” because juries dont like “child killers”. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:32 am by Dylan Gibbs
Here are the lowlights.An Ontario judge pushed defendants to plead guilty by telling defence counsel that their clients were “fucked” because juries dont like “child killers”. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by JD Hull
But elected benches are by nature glaringly "fishy" (i.e., "...dang, Nadine, the campaign money to the judge last year...just don't seem right...the dog don't hunt... [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am by Florian Mueller
It's that they didn't request feedback to specific proposals (and that they didn't make more of an effort to have industry provide researchers with confidential information). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
Paperwork problems don't necessarily mean a home will be saved, if the borrower is genuinely unable to keep paying. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That reads like a jump away from strict scrutiny right down to rational basis scrutiny, which is concerning, especially since we dont know what “enough like” means. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:09 am by SHG
Dont be silly, this is the justice system we’re talking about. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:22 am
" Remember, as a defense counsel you don't have a second chance at argument. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:32 pm by Josh Blackman
[Don't act surprised when Thomas narrowly reads made-up Brennan decision from 1968 that itself reversed precedent.] [read post]