Search for: "*u. S. v. Haves" Results 121 - 140 of 9,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 5:21 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
“It’s an ERISA case, and the issue was whether plaintiffs, who were participants in a defined benefit [DB] plan, […] The post Supreme Court’s Thole v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am by Steven G. Pearl
S. 43, 67 (internal quotation marks omitted), but a case does not become moot as “long as the parties have a concrete interest, however small,” in the litigation’s outcome, Chafin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thomas v Dinkes & Schwitzer, P.C. .2010 NY Slip Op 51666(U) ,Decided on September 23, 2010 Supreme Court, Kings County ,Rivera, J. tells us that a completely inchoherent complaint, while "filled with verbs, nouns, adverbs" etc, will be dismissed. [read post]