Search for: "Andersen v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
United States On 16 June 2014, in the case of Sarah Jones v Dirty World Entertainment [pdf] the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a libel judgment in favour of a former cheerleader for the Cincinnati Bengals Football Team. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm by MOTP
The arbitrator agreed with Rain & Hail that Jody James did not "timely present[] notice of its claim in accordance with the provisions of the crop insurance policy" and, further, "did not state a presentable loss" because crops from performing and non-performing farm units were commingled. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Saraphin Dhanani
United States: “a crime that is similar to the listed examples in some respects but different in others. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast, Inc. and Andersen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:30 pm
And Judge Kaplan concludes with the following passage from Berger v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm by Kevin
” Of course, you should really consider them before doing the bad thing in the first place, so this is sort of a fallback position. 1 See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:46 am by Amy Bray
  As a result of the pro-government condemnation process traditionally in Georgia, and in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Kelo v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]