Search for: "BROWN v. CREDIT ONE BANK" Results 121 - 140 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
This is a special place – one that not only helped me hone my legal skills, but also one that helped mold me into a “citizen lawyer. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Tatum, No. 07-5733 A sentence for bank fraud is vacated where a sentencing enhancement for abusing a position of private trust under U.S.S.G. section 3B1.3 was erroneously applied as defendant did not occupy a position of trust nor possess "special skills". [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
One other rationale for background checks deserves further treatment. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
One potentially important practice is the oft-rumored, but rarely documented routine of certain judges to simply refuse to grant any deficiency judgments in personal foreclosures. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
(docket 11-604), testing the immunity of a foreign government’s central bank to an attempt in U.S. courts to seize assets of the bank, and Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am by rainey Reitman
  Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
This practice did not end until well after the Supreme Court struck down race-based school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of… [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Goldman Sachs, the banking service for Apple Card, released a statement saying, “We have not and never will make decisions based on factors like gender. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Childs, No. 071495, 071597 Convictions for conspiracy to commit murder for hire resulting death are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) denying defendant's Rule 29 motion for acquittal; 2) allowing witness to testify to an out-of-court statement made by indicted co-conspirator; 3) requiring one defendant to testify under a statutory grant of use immunity at his co-defendant's trial; 4) failing to order one defendant, over his attorney's… [read post]