Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 121 - 140
of 10,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 2:25 pm
Keith Lee of An Associates Mind comes out strong: Facebook You v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am
Flynn v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 10:19 am
PBM Products v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 1:28 am
Mega Brands may bring the bricks on the Dutch market. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
In September, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in Celine SARL v Celine SA that use of a brand as a shop name does not necessarily infringe an identical brand covering goods. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:27 pm
Shields v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
Two venerable institutions are working on re-branding. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The case captioned Purdue University v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
So, what about brand protection in this unchartered territory? [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
This is particularly clear from the first post-Brand X decision, United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:51 pm
In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:28 am
STK LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 9:41 pm
The case is Juicy Couture Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:00 am
We have been following the Chiquita Brands International, Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
” Passage of AB5 “creates a brand-new ball game” related to independent contractors, Schickman says. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 8:07 am
" Alcatel USA Resources Inc v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
The backstory Google significantly relaxed its AdWords Trademark Policy in April 2013 in the wake of the High Court of Australia’s decision in Google v ACCC, where previously the policy for Australia had allowed brand owners some measure of protection. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:05 am
Rev. 617 (2012): In the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:56 am
The case Iancu v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law's response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]