Search for: "Brand v. Brand" Results 121 - 140 of 10,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
In September, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in Celine SARL v Celine SA that use of a brand as a shop name does not necessarily infringe an identical brand covering goods. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
Two venerable institutions are working on re-branding. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
So, what about brand protection in this unchartered territory? [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is particularly clear from the first post-Brand X decision, United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:51 pm by Gene Quinn
In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
” Passage of AB5 “creates a brand-new ball game” related to independent contractors, Schickman says. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
The backstory Google significantly relaxed its AdWords Trademark Policy in April 2013 in the wake of the High Court of Australia’s decision in Google v ACCC, where previously the policy for Australia had allowed brand owners some measure of protection. [read post]
6 May 2013, 1:05 am by Paul Caron
Rev. 617 (2012): In the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law's response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]