Search for: "Bright v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2010, 9:18 am
In affirming the Court of Chancery’s finding of fair value in an appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Supreme Court in Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:18 am
In affirming the Court of Chancery’s finding of fair value in an appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Supreme Court in Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bailey v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:34 am
Bright stated “pit bulls as a breed are known to be extremely aggressive and have been bred as attack animals. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:26 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Back in 1998, in State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
Taxpayers for Accountable School Bond Spending v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:28 am
In response to instructions from the United States Supreme Court, and in light of the Supreme Court’s pivotal holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:24 pm
In Biomedical Patent Management v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 2:10 pm
United States case, don’t worry, Bright! [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:10 am
It is not hard to see why this morning’s opinion in Americold Realty Trust v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:37 am
Earlier this month, in Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 5:16 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:21 am
In response to the AGs’ apparent concern that the guidance “purports to supersede state and local hiring laws that impose bright-line criminal background restrictions that are not narrowly tailored,” suggesting that the guidance undermines state laws and represents an “intrusion into state sovereignty,” Berrien denied that the agency’s guidance does any such thing. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
--Martin v PepsiAmericas, Inc., 5th Cir.: The 5th Circuit reiterated its bright-line rule that set-offs and counterclaims are not permissible in FLSA suits in holding that an employer may not set off the value of benefits that it paid out under a severance agreement against a claim for overtime wages under the FLSA. [read post]
