Search for: "Brill v. Brill"
Results 121 - 140
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In Brill v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 6:05 am
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:30 am
Based on the Seventh Circuit’s holding in Brill v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:17 am
See Brill & Meisel v Brown, 113 AD3d 435, 436 (1st Dept 2014). [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:45 am
Per Blockbuster, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 9:45 am
" Brill v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Kaltenbronn v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:28 am
" Brill v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:30 am
Haggenmacher & V. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:36 am
Scott Warfman and Penny Brill for the State and Charlie White and Bruce Fleisher for the defense. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
(citing Brill v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Tomorrow the Court will hear oral arguments in King v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:10 am
Jordan Diamond, eds., Stress Testing the Law of the Sea: Dispute Resolution, Disasters & Emerging Challenges (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2018). [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:16 am
While the defendants' cross motion was made more than 120 days after the note of issue was filed and, therefore, was untimely (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648), an untimely cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where, as here, a timely motion for summary judgment was made on nearly identical grounds (see Grande v Peteroy, 39 AD3d 590, 592; Lennard v Khan, 69 AD3d 812, 814; Bressingham v Jamaica Hosp. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
While the defendants' cross motion was made more than 120 days after the note of issue was filed and, therefore, was untimely (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648), an untimely cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where, as here, a timely motion for summary judgment was made on nearly identical grounds (see Grande v Peteroy, 39 AD3d 590, 592; Lennard v Khan, 69 AD3d 812, 814; Bressingham v Jamaica Hosp. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
., Brill Publications, 2011).Anver M. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 am
Fisher, Antigone v. [read post]
