Search for: "Colors Fashion, Inc."
Results 121 - 140
of 224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
The appellate court granted a limited preliminary injunction against Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc., No. 11-33-3-cv. (2nd Cir. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Holding, Inc., Docket No. 11-3303-cv. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
Holding, Inc., Docket No. 11-3303-cv. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Thus, the district court recognized a per se rule against single color marks in the fashion industry. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
The 31-page decision of the Appeals Court, issued today, held that the District Court erred in holding that a single color could never serve as a trade mark in the fashion industry. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
The court concluded that the district court’s conclusion that a single color could never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
The court concluded that the district court’s conclusion that a single color could never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:16 am
Can a single color serve as a trademark in the fashion industry? [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
Yves Saint Laurent Am., Inc., 778 F. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
Holding, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm
Mead, Anthropologist, Reports On Effect of War on Women's Garb; She Tells Members of Fashion Group, Inc., That Utility Clothes in England Will Do Much to Reduce Class Consciousness. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:42 am
Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, Inc., 2012 WL 2990766 (N.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:13 am
"Had the PTO made the requirement earlier, Applicant asserted, the matter would have been resolved "in a much timelier fashion. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
, Inc., 108 P. 3d 787 (Wash. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:00 am
That was the issue in Shocking Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
