Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 121 - 140
of 46,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
Does 1-27, the Judge has denied all of the defendants' motions, and ruled that the case may proceed.The Judge agreed with the RIAA on every legal issue presented.October 29, 2008, decision*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music… [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
On October 10, the OECD Secretariat released a proposal on Pillar 1 of the project to address tax challenges from the digitalization of the economy. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
This blog entry was originally posted on 6/10/16. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:52 am
It is extremely rare that copyright damages amount to $272 million dollars but I guess when you consider that the judge is offering $1 billion dollars less, $272 million does not seem as much. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Int’l, No. 10-cv-03091-CMA-KLM, 2011 WL 1321955 (D. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:37 am
Department of State, recently stated that has been a substantial reduction for EB-1 numbers, beginning in 10/2010. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
However, we found the impact was less significant than even the word count of claim 1 – only a 10% contribution to the overall weighting. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:46 am
Does 1-20, 2017 WL 4326360, No. 17-810 (D. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
This blog entry was originally posted on 10/23/21. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:42 am
Does 1-13, a subpoena addressed to Verizon, calling for the identities and addresses of John Doe defendants, was returnable May 12th.On May 10th the Court stayed enforcement of the subpoena, and directed plaintiff's counsel to immediately notify Verizon of the stay.Unfortunately, as it turns out, Verizon had responded to the subpoena FIVE (5) DAYS BEFORE THE SUBPOENA'S RETURN DATE, on May 7th.Plaintiff's "motion for clarification"[Ed. note. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Consumer Reports does just this. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Consumer Reports does just this. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:56 am
National Australian Bank Ltd., [1] the Second Circuit’s significant decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
The Future of Regulation No. 1/2003: New Relations Between EU and National Laws Laurence Idot After the launching of consultations on a ‘New Tool’ to deal with the digital economy,1 the revision of Regulation No. 1/20032 (hereafter, ‘the Regulation’) does... [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:45 am
Rosa Maria Hernandez, a 10-year-old undocumented girl with cerebral palsy, may be deported. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
" Br. 7-10 § A.1. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:36 am
Does 1-300, No. 10 C 6255, Slip Op. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:27 am
Reason #1: Intimidation Estate planning does not have to intimidate you! [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Does 1–435, No. 10–4382, at *1 (N .D.Cal. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Effective January 1, 2020, state law legalizes recreational marijuana and allows a person who is at least 21 years old to possess, consume, use, purchase, obtain, or transport marijuana in an amount that does not exceed the law’s possession limit (HB 1438 Sec. 10-5, June 24, 2019). [read post]
