Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2009, 12:02 pm
Circuit in Kiyemba I), especially once the petitioner is physically present within the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am
In an interview . . . the victim stated that someone had fraudulently attempted to apply for credit cards online using his name and identifying information and to change his address with the United States Postal Service. . . . [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
” The United States has avoided these “forced-heirship” laws (although your state’s laws regarding distribution of assets in the absence of a will or estate plan may feel like forced-heirship), but these laws “are prevalent in many parts of the world, notably the Middle East, where Islamic law predominates, and continental Europe. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:29 am
” The United States has avoided these “forced-heirship” laws (although your state’s laws regarding distribution of assets in the absence of a will or estate plan may feel like forced-heirship), but these laws “are prevalent in many parts of the world, notably the Middle East, where Islamic law predominates, and continental Europe. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:06 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:44 pm
Lead Defense Counsel Richard Kammen states that he would like the notice to be something along the lines of “request for ex parte assistance filed” and nothing more, which he says is consistent with federal court practice. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:30 am
The USPTO is also proposing to adjust the fee for filing a request for ex parte reexamination and to set a fee for petitions filed in ex parte and inter partes reexamination proceedings to more accurately reflect the cost of these processes. [read post]
26 Oct 2024, 6:40 am
This is illustrated in the 2001, United States Supreme Court opinion styled, Egelhoff v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia affirming the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director’s vacatur of ex parte reexamination proceedings based on the estoppel provision of the inter partes review (IPR) regime. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:30 pm
Hattip: Grits]The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals today issued its ruling in Ex Parte Jose Ernesto Medellin. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
