Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia affirming the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director’s vacatur of ex parte reexamination proceedings based on the estoppel provision of the inter partes review (IPR) regime. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
[p232] But the facts above recited, and those set forth in Ex parte Endo, supra, show that the exclusion was but a part of an over-all plan for forceable detention. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:30 pm
Hattip: Grits]The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals today issued its ruling in Ex Parte Jose Ernesto Medellin. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:00 pm
In the recent decision Ex parte Chamberlain , Appeal 22-1944 ( Xencor ), the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s new Appeals Review Panel provided clarity regarding its stance on means-plus-function claims. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:19 am
This decision reminds me of United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
(Ex parte Kislevitz, BPAI 2011.) [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
As you probably know, the United States has some of the strongest legal protections for free speech in the world. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am
David Kappos Headlines Post-Grant Patent Trial Program in NYA new addition to the program just announced today is David Kappos, who is the immediate former Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:53 am
On July 2, 2010, ATC filed a second request for ex parte reexamination of the '356 patent with the PTO seeking review of the same claims. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:30 pm
On August 3, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City ruled in favor of EM Ltd. and NML Capital Ltd. in confirming ex parte orders dated May 22, 2007. [read post]
