Search for: "Florida v. Wells" Results 121 - 140 of 6,291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Yet, in turning to law to attack wokeness, DeSantis and the Florida legislature, as well as the broader anti-woke movement, have zeroed in on so-called divisive concepts that do not lead to adverse concrete consequences but merely risk making white men and boys feel uncomfortable for a few minutes. [read post]
2 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Kyle Bradley
Sellers discusses how states and localities have modified their election laws following the Supreme Court’s monumental decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Norman L. Eisen
District Court, Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division 10 -4 5 Mi Familia Vota, et al., v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 7:20 am by Leland Garvin
Golf carts were designated as “dangerous instrumentalities” – the same as motor vehicles – in the 1984 Florida Supreme Court case of Meister v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 7:20 am by Leland Garvin
Golf carts were designated as “dangerous instrumentalities” – the same as motor vehicles – in the 1984 Florida Supreme Court case of Meister v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It should be remebered that only Justice Thomas resorted to originalism in SFFA v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 10:26 pm by Bill Marler
So far, ten deaths have been reported, including one in Illinois, one in New Jersey, one in New York, one in Virginia, one in Florida, one in Tennessee, one in New Mexico, one in New York, and two in South Carolina. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 8:37 am by Edelboim Lieberman PLLC
While the specific filing requirements can vary under Subchapter V and certain other provisions of the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm by Eric Goldman
Based on the ~0.2% confusion rate, the court says: “No reasonable jury would conclude that this percentage is anything but de minimis and fails to support a finding of likelihood of confusion….the evidence Lerner & Rowe has presented is so slight it may as well have presented none at all” (ouch). [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 9:48 am by Anthony P. Guettler
Traditionally, most practitioners believed that a surviving spouse’s rights in community property were vested at the time of death and that probate creditor claims rules did not apply on the death of the first spouse.[6] However, in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:45 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Florida, federal court); and (20) Republican National Committee, et al. v. [read post]