Search for: "Frank v. Evers"
Results 121 - 140
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
"Poll: Death penalty support lowest ever," by MJ Lee at Politico. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
In Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, LLP v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
In Teague v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:57 am
The Supreme Court has declined review in Marek v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
Meantime, trial started for Frank Excel Marley III, a lawyer accused of stealing more than $1 million from the Seminole Tribe. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
As for the definition, if it were rigorous, why would Congress have to intervene in Dodd-Frank and essentially assign to the SEC the authority to define standards for compensation consultants? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm
Lynaugh, and subsequently, in Penry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:55 am
In Barrios v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:22 pm
I would characterize this as one of the most rebloggingest blog posts I've ever written, but for those interested in who is winning the afternoon of financial reform (and I am one), here's Barney Frank's summary of the agreement so far; you'll note there isn't yet agreement on what to do with derivatives, the Volcker Rule, Frannie (which may not get addressed at all), and consumer protection. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
Nor were the plaintiffs ever "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:09 am
The Appeal In a decision by Judge Mary Eileen Kilbane, joined by Judges Frank D. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
If the supporting affidavit had appeared perjurious on its face, the court would have conducted an in camera hearing to determine if the affidavit contained perjury and if it did, would have given the People the choice of turning over the affidavit for a hearing or discontinuing the prosecution (see, Franks v Delaware, 438 US 154; People v Alfinito, 16 NY2d 181). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
AsymaDesign v. [read post]
