Search for: "Greenhouse v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Justice Lewis Powell’s concurring opinion in Plyer v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
United States (9th Cir., Jan. 7, 2019, case no. 18-36082); -United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:53 pm
After United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:17 pm
Cal. 2003); and Mid-States Coalition for Progress v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
Raich and United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
On October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review six of the nine submitted petitions stemming from an appellate court ruling upholding Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) greenhouse gas (“GHG”) controls at utilities, factories and other facilities around the country. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:43 pm
In State of Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
“Foreclosing environmental review of [greenhouse gas] GHG emissions under MEPA prevents state agencies from using any information garnered during this process to inform and strengthen substantive permitting or regulatory decisions or any mutual mitigation measures or alternatives that might be considered when the environmental harms of the proposed project are fully understood. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
United States and Benisek v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:02 am
This afternoon President Bush will give a speech outlining goals for reducing greeenhouse gas emissions in the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
By comparing and contrasting United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:52 am
United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:20 am
See Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:57 am
The rules are a reaction to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:44 pm
The United States Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Pearson v Callahan, Supreme Court No. 07-751, which could greatly expand the authority of the police to search an individual’s home. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:38 am
It's polluting not only the atmosphere but the West Coast of the United States. [read post]
