Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger"
Results 121 - 140
of 370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 9:09 pm
Second, the Court has shown no inclination to overrule outright the most recent ruling allowing the use of race in college admissions — its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Bollinger). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Bakke (1978) and Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Prior to its 2013 decision in the present case, the last time the High Court addressed the issue of affirmative action in higher education admissions was in June 2003 when it upheld, by a 5-4 vote, the University of Michigan’s consideration of race as one of many “plus factors” in its law school admissions policy that considered the overall individual contribution of each candidate (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
Bollinger. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
This was a major change from the Supreme Court’s previous decision in Grutter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
” Twenty-five years later, in the landmark case of Grutter v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:33 am
In a recently posted paper (forthcoming in the Southern California Law Review), Stephen Rich argues for a way to reconstruct the legal conception of diversity—narrowly endorsed in Grutter v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
(Here's the Justice Thomas opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
Taking those two together, as I believe is correct when there is no majority opinion, see CJLF's brief in Grutter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Bollinger. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:15 am
University of Texas and his dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
See Grutter v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:58 pm
This was an important gain for opponents of racial preferences, since the Court’s previous ruling on this issue, Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Bollinger). [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:45 am
Those other people need to acknowledge that they don't know as much as they think, but the things not known surely don't include the things Clarence Thomas has been writing — notably in Grutter v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:42 am
Bollinger, was constitutional. [read post]
