Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 16,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by Tessa Shepperson
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
The calls to repeal no-fault divorce are nonsensical, but they result from the sexist attitudes that drove the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Yet mutual (I hope) admiration societies are boring. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But perhaps ultimately, The Interbellum Constitution is a story about inheriting the Constitution—of how a rising cohort of Americans who succeeded the Founding generation took custody of the constitutional order and, in being the first to do so, laid the groundwork for how constitutional inheritance would itself work in the United States.The book can be read as a rich meditation on that complex process of inheritance—of how Americans who had not been there at the Constitution’s… [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Several other states also filed regulatory enforcement actions against Centene. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Minnesota also relied on the Eighth Circuit's 2023 decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
In contrast, the UPC merely requires that the analysis starts from a “realistic starting point”, as succinctly stated in Headnote 3: 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Metropolitan Police has welcomed the sentences and said it hopes it acts as a deterrent to those who intend to cause disproportionate disruption to Londoners. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 6:52 am by Dennis Crouch
” Feliciano asserts that the word “during” simply denotes a temporal connection, not a substantive one, citing United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here also is a map that summarizes this (from this article); the dark gray states are the ones where this sort of firing is most likely to be illegal: For a case bearing on whether government employers may fire employees for saying, after an assassination attempt on the President, "If they go for him again, I hope they get him," see Rankin v. [read post]