Search for: "Hodges v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Oct. 14, 2008) (reducing punitive damages award to comply with due process requirements of the United States Constitution); Anderson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
On that same date, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark Windsor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 5:21 am
The style of the case is, Calvary United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Virginia, and United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 11:40 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:58 pm
Everson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:37 am
Hodges and Henry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:00 am
United States Marshals Service, 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:34 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is at odds with the Constitution of the United States and the principles upon which the United States is established; and . . .WHEREAS, Obergefell invokes a definition of “liberty” that the framers would not have recognized, . . . and WHEREAS, Obergefell relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as a font of substantive rights, a doctrine that… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The first claimant, O, was born in the United Kingdom in July 2007, attends school and has never left the UK. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
The Court of Appeals issued a published decision in Stankevich v Milliron (Docket No. 310710), holding that, after the United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v Hodges, ___ US ___; 135 S Ct 2584; 192 L Ed 2d 609 (2015), same-sex couples who are married, in this state or others, may assert the equitable parent doctrine. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:28 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
In its brief the Justice Department claimed that the EEOC was “not speaking for the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
In its brief the Justice Department claimed that the EEOC was “not speaking for the United States. [read post]
