Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co." Results 121 - 140 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Joe Barrett This post first appeared on the 11KBW Education Law Blog. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
Haddad reviewed sample case studies from a book she co-authors. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm by Ilya Somin
In an interesting recent post, co-blogger Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argue that President Trump cannot be impeached and convicted for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol because he was engaging in First Amendment-protected speech. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by S2KM Limited
Cynthia Barrett discussed "Post-Windsor Issues for LGBT Couples & Children" from a special needs perspective. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sam Wong
Atkins (D), co-author of the bill, called the ruling “disappointing” and said that “more women on corporate boards means better decisions and businesses that outperform the competition. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Finally, six facts in particular were left out: the names of six un-indicted co-conspirators. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:30 am by jonathanturley
This country is on track to repeat what happened in Germany when it was the greatest democracy going, when it elected a chancellor that then co-opted the media. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013]… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Cooper, Tom Tomorrow, Judi Barrett, Christopher Myers...and many more! [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
  And because she has not done anything that could be deemed a violation of the CADA, CO has not taken any action against her. ** Note: Smith filed her initial complaint in 2016, asserting her plans to open up a wedding website. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:12 am
Less than two weeks after Disner says disagreement over strategy led to his ouster from the firm, the lawyer has asked a judge to name him "co-lead counsel" in the BAR/BRI litigation. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 5:56 am by Josh Blackman
My co-blogger Jon Adler raised this question, which I take to be a very serious point. [read post]