Search for: "In Re Barrett & Co."
Results 121 - 140
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 4:40 pm
As lawyers, we’re oriented to a particular style of thinking—detail oriented, somewhat abstract, risk-averse, not especially emotionally intelligent, very short-term focused in terms of business activities, and with a somewhat odd presumption both that we’re more virtuous than other people and that more selfishness is usually a good thing. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
As Justice Barrett noted, you can't sue Congress to make them repeal a law; and in any case, courts don't issue "writs of erasure," stripping pages out of the Statutes at Large. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Barrett, Micah Chavin, Adam A. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
We’re getting your husbands back to work. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
My students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief, and Daniel P. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 pm
Joe Barrett This post first appeared on the 11KBW Education Law Blog. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
Haddad reviewed sample case studies from a book she co-authors. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
In an interesting recent post, co-blogger Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman argue that President Trump cannot be impeached and convicted for his role in inciting the riot at the Capitol because he was engaging in First Amendment-protected speech. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
Cynthia Barrett discussed "Post-Windsor Issues for LGBT Couples & Children" from a special needs perspective. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman addressed this argument in September. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Atkins (D), co-author of the bill, called the ruling “disappointing” and said that “more women on corporate boards means better decisions and businesses that outperform the competition. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
Finally, six facts in particular were left out: the names of six un-indicted co-conspirators. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
This country is on track to repeat what happened in Germany when it was the greatest democracy going, when it elected a chancellor that then co-opted the media. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013]… [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982); see also Brandenburg v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Cooper, Tom Tomorrow, Judi Barrett, Christopher Myers...and many more! [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Co., 687 F.3d 671, 675 (5th Cir. 2012)). [read post]
