Search for: "In Re Interstate Power Co."
Results 121 - 140
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Once you're in the interstate commerce and [Congress] can regulate it, pretty much all bets are off . . . . [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:33 pm
If you believe you’re a victim of “wage theft” and you’re ready to fight back, you should call DiTommaso-Lubin. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
Res. 401, urging all nations to prohibit and enforce laws to end the cruel dog and cat meat trade. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” In re Int’l Admin. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:52 pm
Res. 1614, by Rep. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Becton Dickinson & Co., No. 14-41384, 2016 WL 7046601, -- F.3d – (5th Cir. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Chief Justice stated that “[s]elling produce in interstate commerce, although certainly subject to reasonable governmental regulation, is not a special governmental benefit that the Government may hold hostage, to be ransomed by the waiver of constitutional protection”. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
The Daily Stormer re-registered with Google, but it also quickly withdrew the registration. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:59 am
"I think we're a long ways away from seeing the impact," Evans said of the new law. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 9:01 am
At the very least, this liberal conventional wisdom recommends rejection of Choice B, deemed to be a naked power grab by Republicans. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(formerly Merck & Co. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
(formerly Merck & Co. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Co., LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
My friend and case-book co-editor Akhil Reed Amar believes that it is “nonsensical” to argue that there was the slightest merit to the Southern argument for secession as presented in 1860-61. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 7:50 am
The problem here is the Federal Power Act, which leaves transmission siting authority with the states. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:10 pm
After all, the Constitutions grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce – that’s found in the Commerce Clause (cited, of course, to that effect in Quill). [read post]
