Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 168,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Control order curfew is reasonable Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:43 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A provision which prevented the Secretary of State for the Home Department from considering whether certain listed countries would return asylum seekers in violation of their human rights did not enact an absolute bar, but was limited in scope. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:29 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:37 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A challenge to the lawfulness of future removal directions did not come within the appeal regime under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:41 am
In State v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In Byrd v United States, 584 U. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:02 am
Shannon (Texas Tech University School of Law) has posted Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Sawicki (Loyola-Chicago School of Law), Rewritten Opinion: Burton v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 8:39 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 8:39 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
United States appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:17 am
Asylum Act provision is incompatible Regina (Nasseri) v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 3:16 am
Home Secretary’s control orders made unlawfully Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ and Others House of Lords “Non-derogating control orders made by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which imposed on the controlled persons an 18-hour curfew and closely restricted their social contacts, amounted to a deprivation of liberty, contrary to article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and were accordingly unlawful. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:36 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national could not be deported on national security grounds to a state where he was at real risk of being tried on evidence obtained by torture because such an expulsion would contravene his right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:32 am
Regina (JL) (a Youth) v Secretary of State for Justice House of Lords “A near-suicide in custody which resulted in the prisoner's mental incapacity triggered the state’s obligation to institute an independent initial investigation which complied with article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, protecting the right to life. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:37 am
Home Secretary did not breach control order duty Secretary of State for the Home Department v E and Another House of Lords “It was not a condition precedent to the making or renewal of a nonderogating control order that the Secretary of State for the Home Department should comply with his duty to keep under review the prospect of successfully prosecuting the controlled person for a terrorism-related activity. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:59 am
No duty of care owed over child support R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
