Search for: "Liu v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
Liu's nomination to the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Barrack Obama was effectively blocked by Senate Republicans who criticized Mr. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am
The hearing also covered rest break issues implicated by Brinkley v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191, 1206 [under UCL, California employer’s failure to pay overtime wages to out-of-state employees was an unlawful business practice]; Tomlinson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:47 am
Charged in the same indictment with one count each of conspiracy, theft by deception and identity theft are George Liu, 33, and Read More... [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
" The Unites States Supreme Court in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Brinker v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
New Relists Liu v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:24 am
The lesson of Shaofeng Yang v Lao Ma Spicy Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:45 am
Liu, No. 06-10758 (8-13-08). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:52 pm
Here, in Stoetzl v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
In Klayman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 10:30 am
See, e.g., Carden v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:13 am
More recently, the court in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:55 am
In City of Long Branch v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:36 pm
After the United States Supreme Court issued the AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm
First up is Duran v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
Wood v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
” Further, he argued that the employee had no ability to waive the states claim comparing it to the case of EEOC v. [read post]
