Search for: "MARTIN v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 121 - 140 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The Court of Appeals combined oral argument in Roni with a second case, Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 5:20 am
Attorney for State: James Martin, Indianapolis, IN. 10:45 AM - Juanita Ivers v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canadian superior courts have jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:42 pm
A court decision this week from California may lend support to these criticisms.In a case titled "Wimsatt v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:29 am by Susan Brenner
Martin, 94 Wn.2d 1, 614 P.2d 164 (Washington Supreme Court 1980)). [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
On April 24, 2017, Law Firm filed two complaints on behalf of NCSLT 2006-3 against Douglass in King County Superior Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:51 am
Quebec’s Superior Court and Court of Appeal upheld the suspension. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Martin J. concurring): “We would allow the appeal and order a new trial. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:09 pm
 First, a de novo appeal can be filed and heard by the superior court, or as illustrated in the recent case of Martin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 10:35 pm
Martin, 2011 ONSC 5447, in which the Superior Court of Justice considered when a lawyer holding an original will may release the will to a person who was not named in the will as an executor (referred to as an estate trustee in Ontario), but who wishes to apply to court to be appointed as an estate trustee. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Thomas R. also argues the superior court erred in admitting testimony from the State's expert witnesses regarding evidence of deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") test results. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:56 am by Richard Renner
This week, the Superior Court for the District of Columbia set a bright line of protection for immigrants seeking to vindicate their rights on the job. [read post]