Search for: "Marc DeGirolami"
Results 121 - 140
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
Movsesian, and Marc O. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:34 pm
In our latest Legal Spirits podcast, my colleague, Marc DeGirolami, discuss the NY case and the Court's jurisprudence regarding Sunday closing laws more generally. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Eugene has graciously invited me to write a few posts about my new article, Traditionalism Rising (forthcoming in the Journal of Contemporary Legal Studies and part of a symposium this fall at the University of San Diego School of Law). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:49 pm
But our own Marc DeGirolami, in the comments to Eric's post, says, in effect, hold the phone: "If this is merely a call for elegant writing, then I suppose I agree (who could be against that?). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
John's on Religious Legal Theory: Religion in Law, Law in Religion put together by Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:43 pm
Free Exercise by Moonlight, By Marc O. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
Marc DeGirolami writes with the following comment on Garnett: I noticed on your Legal Theory Blog that you had posted an excerpt from Rick Garnett's piece on the NRO blog, where Rick asks who could possibly believe in "never" invalidating laws on constitutional grounds. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:05 am
John’s colleagues Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:21 pm
In a recent Legal Spirits podcast, my colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I discuss different possibilities. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm
As my colleague Marc DeGirolami has argued, tradition is an often-overlooked factor in many constitutional doctrines, very much including the Court's establishment and free exercise jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm
My colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I have recorded a podcast on Johnson's comments that explores the controversy in more depth. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:13 pm
We also have a number of distinguished veterans: Bill Araiza, Paul Secunda, Michael Risch, Marc DeGirolami, Marc Blitz, and Will Baude. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
DeGirolami (St. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Marc O. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:58 am
Again, at a superficial level, Jesus is offering a distinction between the two in His answer; but His answer only makes sense, I think, in that he converts the either/or into a both/and.Third, the opinion uses the phrase by defaulting to, as Professor Marc DeGirolami says, “plenipotentiary powers” of the state, then asking whether Christians are exempt from those powers. [read post]
27 May 2025, 6:10 am
My colleague Marc DeGirolami and I discuss the new Washington State law, and the pros and cons of the clergy-penitent privilege generally, in a new Legal Spirits podcast. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
” In a second post at PrawfsBlawg, Marc DeGirolami examines Justice White’s famous proclamation that “death is different,” responding to claims that the Graham decision represents an end to that theory, while in a third post, Ronald Wright compares the two cases. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm
For more thoughts on the case, my colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I have recorded a podcast episode, which you can find here. [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:59 am
Another Update: More thoughtful posts by Paul Horwitz and Marc DeGirolami on Prawfs. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:17 pm
Don Braman (GW), Against Punishment Naturalism John Bronsteen (Loyola): Happiness and Punishment Crim Law: Choice and Chance in Criminal Law Marc DeGirolami (Catholic): Retribution and Justification Vera Bergelson (Rutgers): Strict Liability and Affirmative Defenses William Berry (Ole Miss): All for one and one for all? [read post]
