Search for: "Marc DeGirolami" Results 121 - 140 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 2:19 pm by Olivier Moréteau
im (Emory) Caroline Corbin (Miami) Marc DeGirolami (St. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Philip Hamburger, author of bracing new book Is Administrative Law Unlawful (earlier), has just guest-blogged about it for a week at Volokh Conspiracy, and has a related podcast at Law and Liberty; David Henderson writes rave review of new Peter Schuck book Why Government Fails So Often [Regulation, PDF; excerpts also at Econlib and more, earlier on Schuck book] Legal academia stunned, in grief after highly regarded criminal law specialist Dan Markel is murdered in his Tallahassee home… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Marc DeGirolami
Eugene has graciously invited me to write a few posts about my new article, Traditionalism Rising (forthcoming in the Journal of Contemporary Legal Studies and part of a symposium this fall at the University of San Diego School of Law). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:49 pm
But our own Marc DeGirolami, in the comments to Eric's post, says, in effect, hold the phone: "If this is merely a call for elegant writing, then I suppose I agree (who could be against that?). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:14 am by Michael Helfand
John's on Religious Legal Theory: Religion in Law, Law in Religion put together by Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami.   [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:24 pm by Mark Movsesian
My colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I have recorded a podcast on Johnson's comments that explores the controversy in more depth. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm by Mark Movsesian
As my colleague Marc DeGirolami has argued, tradition is an often-overlooked factor in many constitutional doctrines, very much including the Court's establishment and free exercise jurisprudence. [read post]
24 May 2023, 2:21 pm by Mark Movsesian
In a recent Legal Spirits podcast, my colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I discuss different possibilities. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:05 am by Peggy McGuinness
John’s colleagues Mark Movsesian and Marc DeGirolami. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:58 am by Lawrence Solum
Marc DeGirolami writes with the following comment on Garnett: I noticed on your Legal Theory Blog that you had posted an excerpt from Rick Garnett's piece on the NRO blog, where Rick asks who could possibly believe in "never" invalidating laws on constitutional grounds. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:13 pm
We also have a number of distinguished veterans: Bill Araiza, Paul Secunda, Michael Risch, Marc DeGirolami, Marc Blitz, and Will Baude. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:58 am by Derek T. Muller
Again, at a superficial level, Jesus is offering a distinction between the two in His answer; but His answer only makes sense, I think, in that he converts the either/or into a both/and.Third, the opinion uses the phrase by defaulting to, as Professor Marc DeGirolami says, “plenipotentiary powers” of the state, then asking whether Christians are exempt from those powers. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
”  In a second post at PrawfsBlawg, Marc DeGirolami examines Justice White’s famous proclamation that “death is different,” responding to claims that the Graham decision represents an end to that theory, while in a third post, Ronald Wright compares the two cases. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm by Mark Movsesian
For more thoughts on the case, my colleague, Marc DeGirolami, and I have recorded a podcast episode, which you can find here. [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Another Update:  More thoughtful posts by Paul Horwitz and Marc DeGirolami on Prawfs. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:17 pm
Don Braman (GW), Against Punishment Naturalism John Bronsteen (Loyola): Happiness and Punishment   Crim Law: Choice and Chance in Criminal Law Marc DeGirolami (Catholic): Retribution and Justification Vera Bergelson (Rutgers): Strict Liability and Affirmative Defenses William Berry (Ole Miss): All for one and one for all? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
  in the longer run, we suspect that [it] will generate few, if any, additional victories for commercial employers seeking to impose the costs of their religious convictions on their employees”; Zoe Henson, who in The New Republic offers the perspective of a woman who uses contraception for medical reasons; Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic, who analyzes what he sees as the underlying reasons for some opposition to the mandate; Andrew Koppelman in The New Republic, who describes the… [read post]