Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 118,745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler and Anthony Ghiotto
Who may be in (the trans closet)For transgender individuals who have not been diagnosed with dysphoria, have not physically transitioned, have not taken hormone therapy, and do not have any symptoms of or can successfully conceal symptoms consistent with gender dysphoria, they may, in practice remain in service. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
By operation of CPR 6.8(b), the claim form may be served at ‘section 48 address’ being an address given by a defendant which they may be served. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 1:29 pm by Erika Barbara
The court acknowledged the holding in Leeper but stated it was not persuasive. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 10:20 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
” For that reason, the government may not “capriciously take [] from him” (or her, or they) their right to reside in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 6:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Amotion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss a complaint or petition on the ground that a defense is founded on documentary evidence may be appropriately granted where the documentary evidence utterly refutes the plaintiff’s or petitioner’s allegations conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 6:08 am by Fawad Poya
Security Council, may confer a certain level of international recognition. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 3:25 am by Luke Schooling and Christina Pretorius
Weir requested reasons for his intended removal, but the shareholders declined to provide any, stating that he would have the opportunity to discuss this at the meeting. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
Nearly a decade ago, Delaware banned fee-shifting provisions in charters and bylaws just a year after the state’s Supreme Court approved them in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Supreme Court expanded insider trading liability beyond the classical theory when it endorsed the SEC’s misappropriation theory in United States v. [read post]