Search for: "Miller v. Municipal Court" Results 121 - 140 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Marin Municipal Water Dist., etc. (1st Dist. 2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614; Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument this morning in a high-profile case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which “the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require workers who are not members to help pay for collective bargaining,” “could deal a crushing blow to organized labor. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 1:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2942, at 368 (1973)). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:28 am by Walter Olson
” [WKMG Orlando] Retired Justice John Paul Stevens isn’t buying the “Thomas should recuse” meme [USA Today via Legal Ethics Forum] Not COPPA-cetic: among other unintended consequences, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has encouraged parents to help kids to falsify ages online [Danah Boyd via Jim Harper, Suderman, Reason, Stewart Baker, earlier] Lawmaking from the bench: Maryland high court strikes down law limiting landlords’ lead paint… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Recognizing Birmingham’s right to speak free from state interference was indicated by Supreme Court precedent, the judge observed, because the Court, as early as 1960 in Gomillion v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 8:22 am
  I promised elaboration on this question in an earlier blog (#8).For public works contracts where payment bonds are required by statute (RSA 447:16 et seq. for state and municipal projects, the Miller Act for federal projects), the answer appears to be “No. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
If the Court were to rule that its last major ruling on the issue — the six-to-three decision in 2000 in Hill v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Representatives Howard Berman, Barney Frank, Zoe Lofgren and George Miller (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-440 Case name: Rothgery v. [read post]