Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 121 - 140
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
I think a more likely explanation flows from Paul Ohm’s Myth of the Superuser: many of these experts have seen what truly talented hackers can do, given sufficient time, resources, and information. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
[3] Paul Ohm, “The Myth of the Superuser: Fear, Risk, and Harm Online,” UC Davis Law Review 41, no. 4 (2008), 1401 [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Paul Ohm’s work: “Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7“.) __ Eric’s Comments: (1) Is it clear yet to you that the Song-Beverly Act isn’t aging well? [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Lenard, President and Senior Fellow, Technology Policy Institute Paul Ohm, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law Frank A. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* Ohm, Paul. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
As Paul Ohm presciently observed in 2010, the ease of reidentification of presumably anonymous data poses great threats to individual safety. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
Eric has posted about Professor Ohm's reidentification work, which shows how the distinction between PII and non-PII is becoming less useful: "Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Paul Ohm argued that that legal solutions are better for cyber civil rights problems than technological solutions. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
As detailed by Paul Ohm, she later proved just a birthdate, zip code and gender is enough to identify 87 percent of the population, and knowing where someone is makes them even easier to ID. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:54 pm
But we do need to recognize what Paul Ohm has demonstrated in his recent work: there is an inverse relationship between anonymization and utility for a broad range of data. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
., Paul Ohm, Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, 57 UCLA Law Review 1701 (2010). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
As Ethan recaps and as Paul Ohm indicated (United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:43 pm
University of Colorado law and telecommunications scholar Paul Ohm, a former federal prosecutor, said in a telephone interview that the software “verges on wiretapping.” What’s most alarming about it, he said, was that it exists. “There’s a lot of really sensitive stuff that you never ever realized that anybody was saving,” he said. “One really likely scenario, the FBI, once they get wind of this, it’s going to give them a trove of… [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 8:02 am
Others have touched on it, including: computer scientists, who have studied “interactive techniques” involving active data administrators who selectively filter and disclose information; (see Paul Ohm’s Broken Promises for discussion); health regulators, who have built the (somewhat related) idea of “health information trustees” or “information custodians” into draft health information legislation; mobile technology (and other software)… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Tom Goldstein of this blog explains the “odd alignment” of the Court’s two majority opinions in Jones, while Paul Ohm of Freedom to Tinker characterizes the three opinions in the case as a “near-optimal result” for those who argue that Fourth Amendment jurisprudence insufficiently protects privacy in light of new technology. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
But we do need to recognize what Paul Ohm has demonstrated in his recent work: there is an inverse relationship between anonymization and utility for a broad range of data. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:04 am
Paul Ohm at Co-Op gives a chilling vision of world of private police, security forces that serve their employer, not the public. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
However, there are others, such as Professor Paul Ohm, who argue that “nonmonetary harm abounds online” and that regulators ought to be able to address those harms – even if they are more subjective in nature – provided that the harms are non-trivial. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
As Paul Ohm mentioned yesterday, the recent scrutiny has focused mainly on the ability of ISPs to intercept and analyze the online traffic of its users-- in a word, surveillance. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
" These cases confirm the need for Digital Due Process reforms, as CDT Fellow Paul Ohm and EFF have already noted. [read post]
