Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 121 - 140 of 3,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Kagan
What Justice Kavanaugh’s majority opinion does instead is hold that courts cannot order the Executive Branch to arrest and prosecute more people. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 3:58 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Texas left open the possibility that “a challenge to an Executive Branch policy that involves both the Executive Branch’s arrest or prosecution priorities and the Executive Branch’s provision of legal benefits or legal status could lead to a different standing analysis”. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
And yet, not Congress but two Executive Branch agencies have now added a “Mother, May I? [read post]
Some people are waving flags and watching the fireworks, proud of the America they think it is. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The court-enforced Constitution fully displaces other institutional forms of constitutional argument such as legislative constitutional duty only in the mid-twentieth century, as the Court becomes identified with Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:53 am by SHG
Jamelle Bouie raises a very interesting point from Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Biden v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
Serious standing issues aside, Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm
  We have three separate but equal branches of government. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” i) The Role and Importance of the Superior Court Canada’s system of parliamentary democracy has three branches, the executive, legislative and judicial. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
 The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]