Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 121 - 140 of 5,953
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
  On that basis, it did not need to consider SSE’s cross appeal based on the saving provisions in List C, CAA 2001, s 23. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Further, the Committee voted in favour of amendments to relevant definitions (‘authorised entity’) (s 1) and the provision on accessible format shifting for people with disabilities and cross-border exchange (s 19D) to clarify that the provision was immediately operable and not dependent on regulations. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Alex Phipps
The State did not cross-appeal the habitual felon and sentencing issues. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:21 am by SHG
Tim Cushing does an excellent job of saying what needed to be said about the Third Circuit’s decision in Fenico v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:10 am by Stuart Kaplow
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. [read post]