Search for: "People v. Jennings" Results 121 - 140 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm by Cecillia Wang
And so October Term 2018’s biggest immigration case leaves for another day the question whether the mandatory immigration detention statute, as interpreted in the government’s favor in Preap and the previous term’s Jennings v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:25 am by Sean Quirk
The People’s Republic of China (PRC), however, claims a continental shelf based on these features, which the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) rejected in its 2016 ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am by Zachary Burdette
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Victoria Clark
Harry Graver summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Cori Alonso-Yoder considers Jennings v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:16 am by Katherine Pompilio
  The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the U.S. government in FBI v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
All are welcome and [particularly Jens ...]. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
"Whether those people, on both sides, agree with what the Supreme Court was going to do or not, didn't mean they didn't see it coming. [read post]