Search for: "People v. Martin" Results 121 - 140 of 1,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
The government points to a long history of restricting gun ownership by people who pose a threat to others. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wade and the purportedly democratic approach allowed by Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The list included former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan and former People editor Neil Wallis. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm by Aaron Moss
The film proved to be a star turn for Will Smith and Martin Lawrence and was followed by two sequels. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
City of Philadelphia (Injury in fact standing doctrine) Martin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by Elin Hofverberg
Soon Gustav gathered a group of men from Dalarna, who in Västerås fought all the Danes to flee, and asked archbishop Gustav to not use his troops against his own people but instead against the enemies of the church; but he did not listen and became the enemy of the prince; was banished and sent to Denmark. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am by David Aaron
Martin III, No. 1:17-cr-69, ECF No. 41 (March 6, 2017). [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Underwood, the Supreme Court invalidated a similar provision of the Alabama constitution that disenfranchised people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]