Search for: "People v. Murphy"
Results 121 - 140
of 679
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 7:56 pm
In 2018, the NCAA (along with the Trump administration and various professional sports leagues) was on the losing side in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
The case in McBrayer v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection London company Pension House Exchange (PHE) has been fined £45,000 for making more than 39,000 nuisance calls to people about their pensions. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:24 am
”The case, Alma v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Nov. 6, 2020) Murphy v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 3:41 pm
Millison v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Dunn and McGrain v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:14 am
Keynote Address: A Discussion with Senator Chris Murphy About His New Book, "The Violence Inside Us. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:27 pm
" Murphy, 138 S. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:53 pm
In this field, she tended to vote in favor of very broad federal power even in some cases where other liberal justices went the other way, as in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:43 am
Sincerely, Senator Steven V. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
There is also renewed bipartisan interest in a federal remedy that would restrict states’ ability to impose income taxes on people not physically present in the state. [read post]
