Search for: "People v. Spencer" Results 121 - 140 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The previous column noted the Spencer decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that discussed how intrusive such information can be and how extensive inferences can be made from a small amount of browsing data. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
 Will a lot of people seek to sneak survey evidence is, even where it shouldn't be? [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Spencer, 700 F.3d 317 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
I’ve got to run right now, but I thought I’d note this, and point to the 2-to-1 decision, Blackhorse v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by David Fraser
As I blogged yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada has announced that it will release its decision in the appeal from Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in R v Spencer, 2011 SKCA 144. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Before you huff and puff about the iniquity of it all, bear in mind that you lot (landlords) had the section 21 decision of Spencer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]