Search for: "People v Holmes"
Results 121 - 140
of 671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:02 pm
On November 3, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its unanimous opinion in People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
Are the character traits of Sherlock Holmes protected by intellectual property? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:13 am
Daniel Wiessner of Reuters reports that lawyers for James Holmes, who is charged with killing twelve people and injuring many more in a 2012 shooting at a Colorado movie theater, have filed a cert. petition seeking review of a ruling by New York’s highest court in favor of a journalist who has declined to reveal her sources for a story about the shooting. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
Holm (1932), Bush v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:18 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
The justices of the Supreme Court have historically included people who seemed, even during their service, to be genuine visionaries. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Holmes Prods. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 8:46 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
Better than the later Sherlock Holmes, and that's saying something. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Because people will be trampled to death. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
"It's especially interesting, I think, that Alito echoes Justice Holmes in Lochner that the Constitution was made for people "with fundamentally different views. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
(David Bernstein) In comments to some of my recent posts, some commenters have suggested that few people nowadays get especially worked up about Lochner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:23 am
People v Holmes, 2010 NY Slip Op 9683, 2010 N.Y. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
The basic problem, as Jack fully realizes, is how one constructs a stable--and admirable--polity for what Holmes called people of "fundamentally different views," where some of the central differences involve precisely what might count as "the public interest" or "pubic good. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Here is the abstract: In McDonald v. [read post]
