Search for: "People v J."
Results 121 - 140
of 7,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 6:03 am
I’ve seen several versions of the claim that Justice Elena Kagan’s opinion in Chiafalo v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
Second, in a darker vein, once defendant's arrested and taken to the police station for questioning, he eventually says: ""[J]ust put me in a cell by myself with my belt and I'll take care of it," and, later, "[C]ome on, just take me out back and just put a bullet in my head. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:15 am
Here are the materials in Akiachak Native Community v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am
2011 NY Slip Op 21015 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Pazaratz’s decision in J.N. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
This point arises from the Appellant’s objection to the fact that Warby J took into account in determining “has caused” the fact that there would be people who read the articles and did not know the Respondent but may get to know him at some unspecified point in the future. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
[Post by Venkat] People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
The permanent damage that internet publications can inflict is very much the focus of Tugendhat J’s assessment of damages in the case of ZAM v CFW & Anor [2013] EWHC 662 (QB), encapsulated in the memorable description he quoted in an earlier judgment: “what is to be found on the internet may become like a tattoo“. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:30 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 23 June 2023 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Dube v Warwick. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:38 am
Macalister-Smith & J. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:54 pm
The serious nature and consequences of the claimant’s misconduct, which, relying on cases such as Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42 and Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227, Nicol J held to be relevant to the question of reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
10,000 people have sued. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
by Philip J. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
J. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
United States(1961) 368 U.S.208, 229 (Black, J., dissenting). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
J. [read post]
