Search for: "People v. Fields (1983)"
Results 121 - 140
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 11:04 am
People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Fields, No. 07-10384 The denial of Defendant's motion to vacate his drug sentence based on ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed, where Defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an Apprendi objection that the Court of Appeals had previously rejected. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Don't be one of those people. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:48 pm
J., Fielding, J. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 8:36 am
In Slaight Communications Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In no field that I dabble in is this theoretical gap more evident than with regard to voting rights. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
Domestic rape cases in the late 18thand 19th centuries show that people did not even want to talk about rape in the context of the new prudery of the time. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:57 pm
” Clay v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am
Seven people have been hospitalized. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” However, he explained, to interpret the term “increased risk” in the statute, courts should rely on “the relevant medical field. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
(See Downing v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm
Nor is Kanerva v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:26 am
Thank you for working for the people. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]
