Search for: "People v. Holmes"
Results 121 - 140
of 680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
In People v DePiazza, Court of Appeals No. 284946, the Court of Appeals finally struck down one application of Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA).Robert DiPiazza was convicted at the age of eighteen for consensual sex with his then fifteen year old girl friend. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
Are the character traits of Sherlock Holmes protected by intellectual property? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:02 pm
On November 3, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its unanimous opinion in People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:13 am
Daniel Wiessner of Reuters reports that lawyers for James Holmes, who is charged with killing twelve people and injuring many more in a 2012 shooting at a Colorado movie theater, have filed a cert. petition seeking review of a ruling by New York’s highest court in favor of a journalist who has declined to reveal her sources for a story about the shooting. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
Holm (1932), Bush v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:18 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
The justices of the Supreme Court have historically included people who seemed, even during their service, to be genuine visionaries. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Holmes Prods. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 8:46 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
Better than the later Sherlock Holmes, and that's saying something. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Because people will be trampled to death. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
"It's especially interesting, I think, that Alito echoes Justice Holmes in Lochner that the Constitution was made for people "with fundamentally different views. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
(David Bernstein) In comments to some of my recent posts, some commenters have suggested that few people nowadays get especially worked up about Lochner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:23 am
People v Holmes, 2010 NY Slip Op 9683, 2010 N.Y. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
The basic problem, as Jack fully realizes, is how one constructs a stable--and admirable--polity for what Holmes called people of "fundamentally different views," where some of the central differences involve precisely what might count as "the public interest" or "pubic good. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Here is the abstract: In McDonald v. [read post]
