Search for: "People v. James (1987)" Results 121 - 140 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider that the lawyer Trump hired to defend him against a charge that he incited violence against peaceful protesters at a campaign event cited Clinton v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6]  Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The state is constituted by the union of people and government, and it is the state that claims against all other states the twin rights of territorial integrity and political sovereignty. . . . [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
(O’Reilly, James T., Dialogue with the Designers: Comparative Influences on Products Design Norms Imposed by Regulators and by the Third Restatement of Products Liability, 26 N. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
The police were then contacted (R. 135).Snell said that it was not difficult to go under the house to seewhere the depression was located, and that there were houses onboth sides of the DeCarr residence, and people from those houses could see what they were doing (R. 138-39). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
"[T]he phrase 'no legitimate purpose' means the absence of a reason or justification to engage someone, other than to hound, frighten, intimidate or threaten" (People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]