Search for: "People v. Page"
Results 121 - 140
of 9,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:45 pm
v=u6XAPnuFjJc&feature=player_embedded . [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
McLaughlin v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
Including a variety of interesting people and hotspots. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:07 pm
It's 73 pages long. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
(The dissents obviously disagree.)You can read the entire 118 pages (!) [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
Justice Liu authors this opinion, in which -- in 77 pages -- the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms Mr. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
Wow: This is a long opinion.After reading 110+ pages, I'm still not totally convinced that Ryan Roberts actually killed 13-year old Jessica Funk-Haslam. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:21 pm
The writing is crisp and clean.Though then, after discovering (on page 19) that the opinion was from Justice Bedsworth, I then got (at the end) to the page or two of amendments that were subsequently added to the opinion once the Court of Appeal granted the request to publish. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
For example, here, the appellate opinion is only seven double-spaced pages long. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:05 am
A lot.The majority opinion spans 69 pages. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
The SCOTUSwiki page is here.At SCOTUS Blog, Lyle Denniston had this initial report.In the new DNA evidence case, District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:08 am
When he left the residence, Haney and [Winkfield] were the only people present. . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 10:19 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:44 am
Now, reasonable people might disagree about the answer to that question. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
That's pages 2 through 8.One the other hand, you have the mitigation evidence. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:29 am
Not because it involves anything doctrinally complicated, and certainly not because the legal issues were exciting enough to be worth wading through sixty-seven pages of text. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 2:46 pm
A version of "Name That Tune" with respect to opinions from the California Court of Appeal would be to attempt to accurately and summarize the thing in as few sentences as possible.For this opinion from today, I can Name That Tune in a single sentence:The evidence isn't insufficient as a matter of law to keep someone detained as an SVP when he's a repeat child molester who forthrightly admits that he can't guarantee that he won't molest another child upon his release,… [read post]
