Search for: "People v. Payne" Results 121 - 140 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
   This case has probably had the greatest impact on internet freedom of expression (and therefore arguably all freedom of expression) given Google’s pre-eminence as our means of obtaining information on people. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:57 am
  This changed with the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
It’s also unlikely officials would bring only obstruction charges amid several other Trump investigations into potential crimes, the people said. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John-Paul Boyd
We are intimately familiar with the rules of evidence, both statutory and uncodified, and understand the rationale for the counterintuitive principle expressed in Browne v Dunn. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am by familoo
I’m don’t want to beat up Napo over this, particularly since the three very nice Napo people who took the trouble to travel to meet with me were plainly well intentioned and hard working practitioners with a wealth of experience in the field and who struck me as appropriately concerned, and anxious to turn this into a learning experience. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Scope of Liability             In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Colan Associates of Florida, LLC and The Jones Payne Group, Inc., of Mass., have agreed to pay $25,000 for alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos. [read post]