Search for: "People v. Smith (1985)"
Results 121 - 140
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Here is the decision in Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Commonwealth, 230 Va. 208 (1985). 1. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Commonwealth, 230 Va. 208 (1985). 1. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
In West v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In one case, Little v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Only in 1983 did the General Assembly amend Section 401(a) to add the 90-days-before-filing alternative (see Section 401(a), Supplement to Historical and Practice Notes, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 40, ¶ 401 (Smith-Hurd 1985 pocket part)). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.97.K5R44 1996 Regenstein Smith, Beverly McQueary. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
California (1973), though with extra detail added by Smith v. [read post]
