Search for: "People v. Smith (1989)"
Results 121 - 140
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Also, inner-city residents have good reason to fear police dogs: Attacks on people by police dogs are disproportionately high when compared with attacks on people in more affluent areas. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:52 pm
One could say that the internet is the largest audience imaginable, yet just because millions of people could have come across the information does not mean that millions of people did. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
" (Oxford English Dict. (2d ed. 1989) at [as of Jan. 31, 2003].) [read post]
7 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Smith. [read post]
8 May 2022, 7:13 am
’ Smith Oil Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
Under Duren v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court, in Nunn v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Normative foundations of business may include the moral and not only economic value of promises, morally articulated fiduciary duties of agency (including duties of care, candor, and loyalty), and the obligation to show respect to all business participants, including a moral imperative to treat employees and customers as people who deserve dignity and due recognition – and not merely as means to the ends of making profits for others.[20] Adam Smith and his followers in… [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
As an example, Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
