Search for: "Perry v. Stephens" Results 121 - 140 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by David Ward
(Anything by Earle Stanley Gardner (Perry Mason); his stories were part of the reason I became a lawyer. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:10 am by Matt Cooper
Perry, the Supreme Court let stand an October decision of the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:55 am by Adrian Lurssen
Perry v Schwarzenegger California Prop. 8 decision 8-4-2010[By: Bryan Beel |In: Personal Rights]3. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm by Colin Murray
Related PostsSeptember 17, 2010 -- Weekend Reading: Perry on Rights, Constitutions and Courts (0)September 10, 2010 -- Weekend Reading: Stephen Gardbaum on the “Commonwealth” model of Human Rights Protection (0) [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:22 am by Eric
" * Ars Technica: A debrief of Paramount executive Alfred Perry's law school speaking tour about online copyright [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
A spouse's ideological commitments (or professional activities related to those commitments) are generally not a grounds for recusal, see, e.g., Judge Stephen Reinhardt's opinion in Perry v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a separate opinion concurring in the denial of cert, joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:03 am by Rick Garnett
After all, Justice Stephen Breyer’s controlling opinion in the 2005 Ten Commandments case, Van Orden v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 5:57 pm
  Also note that the result in the case cited by Perry would be different in  California if the provisions governing the enforceability of mediated agreements are not met . . . at least so long as the Supreme Court does what we believe it will in Simmons v. [read post]