Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 121 - 140 of 7,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
[This is the fifth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:31 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
It’s a silly hypothetical, but its an interesting way to think about the Third Circuit’s recent decision in Kaplan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 3:30 am by Immigration Prof
Law professors Peter Margulies and Shoba Wadia, along with WilmerHale, filed an amici curiae brief on behalf of a group of immigration law professors in the travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:16 pm by scanner1
.; and ROGER and CARRIE PETERS, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:17 am by immigrationprof
PENNumbra, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review's online publication, has a discussion between Professors Peter Spiro (Temple) and Kit Johnson (Oklahoma) on "Immigration Preemption after United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:53 am
Daniel Sokol Peter Love (Jones Day) and Ryan Thomas (Jones Day) write on the topic of FTC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Duncan Calow
In 2010, in the F.B.T Productions v Aftermath Records case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ("Ninth Circuit") ruled in favour of the rapper Eminem and his producers, F.B.T, finding that, under their agreement with Aftermath, digital music should be treated as a license subject to a 50% royalty payment. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 10:11 pm
Peter has information about the companion case EchoStar v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Peter Lattman has details, including the... [read post]