Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 36,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2009, 3:25 am
Bovale Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Court of Appeal “While a judge had no power to alter the Civil Procedure Rules or vary any practice direction, either by a judgment or purported practice direction, he did have an inherent jurisdiction to include procedural directions of a general application where [...] [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
My tentative assessment is that the Court has gutted the states' spending powers Exhibit A for this thesis is a comparison between the Court's opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:39 am by InternationalLaw Blogger
The United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Bond v United States yesterday, a closely watched case involving the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC materials) that potentially could have restricted the federal government's treaty powers. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
Governor, 18) addressing judicial compensation in that state within the framework of separation of powers. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:34 am
SK (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “While the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had power to pronounce an oral decision at the conclusion of a hearing, it was the written determination which constituted the decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State for Justice power to block the release on licence of prisoners sentenced between 1991 and 2003 to prison terms of more than 15 years, was not compatible with article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, providing that anyone deprived of his liberty had the right to have the lawfulness of his detention… [read post]