Search for: "Price v. Deal et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2012, 6:58 am
Feldberg, Et Al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Green New Deal. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 10:03 am
Ace American Insurance Co., et al., No. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
In fact, it’s fair to view Function Media v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:44 am
Airgas, Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 7:43 pm
The Delaware Chancery Court recently addressed a novel attorney-client privilege issue in an appraisal action, ruling FairXchange LLC could not shield the merger deal knowledge of its dual-role director/investment funds manager from two plaintiff investor funds because both the funds and the director were in a ‘”circle of confidentiality” in Hyde Park Venture Partners Fund III L.P. et. al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
EnviroTech Remediation Services, Inc. et. al., Civ. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am
Google Inc. et al (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps NPT, Inc – Patent troll sues Apple, Google, HTC, LG, Microsoft and Motorola and Motorola over Smartphones (BlawgIT) US Copyright Media Industry’s push against network service providers (ipeg) The internet responds to ASCAP’s deceptive claims (Electronic Frontier Foundation) What do Twilight and a US Senate candidate have in common? [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:49 am
Inc. et al., No. 08-CV-2793 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals GmbH et al (EPLAW) Prilosec (Omeprazole) – US: AstraZeneca ordered to pay attorney’s fees for ‘baseless’ suit to protect Prilosec OTC: AstraZeneca AB et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:08 am
The class action suit: OSTROSKI CLASS ACTION – FINAL FILED VERSION The arbitration complaint: Class Arbitration Demand and Complaint A class action against Chesapeake for underpayment of royalties was filed in 2013 in Pennsylvania, Demchak Partners Limited Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
Avanci et al., 5th Cir., 2022) to the East Coast (FTC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Corwin, et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
SHC Laguna Niguel I, LLC et al, 2021 WL 2165208 (C.D. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
This past week, several consumer protection and regulatory actions made headlines: Court of Appeals Rules Spokeo Requires Actual Harm A three-judge appellate panel dismissed the case in Hancock et al. v. [read post]
