Search for: "ROGERS et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Goldsmith et al. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 10:30 am
Circuit Rules That Public Health Law Empowers Government to Expel Asylum-Seekers—But Not to Countries Where They Face Persecution or Torture (Lawfare Blog, March 2022) [text]The Elusive Concept of Moral Turpitude (Jeffrey Chase Blog, March 2022) [text via Immigration Law]"New rules aim to decide US asylum cases in months, not years," AP News, 24 March 2022 [text]Rohingya in America: The Challenge of Language and Culture (RLI Blog, March 2022) [text]Reports:The Department of Homeland… [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was filed in one case on 5/14/20:Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
HISTORIC CLASS-ACTION DECISION RELEASEDOn September 15, 2022, City Limits reported on a recent New York County Supreme Court decision which may ultimately benefit some 2000 Harlem tenants.The case - - Maddicks et al. v 106-108 Convent BCR, LLC - - involves eleven (11) buildings that are part of the Big City Realty/Magnolia Holdings portfolio. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Cave et al v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm
§ 102(a); (7) the ALJ’s finding that claims 34-35 and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent are not obvious in view of the ‘767 patent and Sakata et al. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:40 pm
Colin Loftin, Ph.D., et al., “Effects of Restrictive Licensing of Handguns of Homicide and Suicide in the District of Columbia,” 325 New Eng. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 11:51 pm
Doug Mockett & Co. et al., 2-04-cv-02868 (CACD December 22, 2008, Minutes). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Lupin Ltd. et al. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
I have previously written about how Rogers et al are trying to get a refund of their “ringtone” payments made to SOCAN going back to 2003 in light of the SCC’s July 12, 2012 decision in ESA v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 1:39 am
That behavior, in and of itself, constitutes an abuse.The case (Société du Figaro et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm
§ 102(a); (7) the ALJ’s finding that claims 34-35 and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent are not obvious in view of the ‘767 patent and the Sakata et al. prior art reference under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:12 am
South Pasadena Police Officers Assn., et. al. v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 6:57 am
Facts: This case (Wildman et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Pudas, et al., Respondents, Brett R. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Pudas, et al., Respondents, Brett R. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Pudas, et al., Respondents, Brett R. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Pudas, et al., Respondents, Brett R. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Pudas, et al., Respondents, Brett R. [read post]
